2020-VIL-491-MAD-DT
MADRAS HIGH COURT
CRL.O.P.No.31909 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.17511 & 17522 of 2019
Date: 06.03.2020
SHRI KEWALCHAND KOTHARI
Vs
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 (1) ,
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Selvendran
For Respondent : Mrs.Sheela, Standing Counsel for IT cases
BENCH
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
JUDGMENT
This petition has been filed challenging the criminal proceedings in E.O.C.No.575 of 2017 on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate(Economic Offences), Egmore, Chennai.
2. The respondent filed private complaint for the offences under Section 276 (c ) (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 alleging that the petitioner is an assessee on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Chennai. A search has been conducted under Section 132 of Income Tax Act on 18.12.2012 and during the search, the petitioner disclosed undisclosed income of Rs. 10,00,00,000/- for the assessment year 2013-2014. Further, it was noticed that the accused did not file his return of income for the assessment year 2013-2014 as required under Section 139 (1) of the Income Act. He ought to have filed return of income on or before 05.08.2013. But he belatedly filed his return of income for the assessment year 2013-2014 only on 31.01.2014 admitting his entire income of Rs. 10,17,53,890/- Thus, it is the act of the willful failure on the part of the petitioner for non payment of huge tax liability, and he committed offence under Section 276(c ) (2) of the Income Tax Act and as such the respondent issued show cause notice on 17.07.2017. Even then, the accused has not paid the huge tax liability at the time of filing the return of income. Thus, he has committed offence under Section 276 (c ) (2) of the Income Tax Act and lodged the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that when the petitioner filed his return of income and paid the entire demand made by the respondent, he is not liable to be punished under Section 276 (c ) (2) of Income Tax Act.
4. Heard, Mr.A.Selvendran, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.Sheela, Standing Counsel for IT cases, appearing for the respondent.
5. On perusal of the documents, it is seen that the last date for filing the returns for the financial year 2012-2013 was on or before 05.08.2013. The respondent did not hand over the book of accounts seized from the petitioner ill 05.08.2013. Therefore, there is three months delay in payment of income tax and the petitioner filed return of income on 31.01.2014. Thereafter, it was returned on 31.03.2015 directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 4,08,04,345/-. Thereafter, the petitioner paid tax as demanded by the respondent on 13.03.2018, for which the respondent also issued a letter on 24.03.2018 acknowledging the receipt of tax. It is relevant to extract the provision under Section 276 (c ) (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1995 as follows:
“If a person wilfully attempts in any manner whatsoever to evade the payment of any tax, penalty or interest under this Act, he shall, without prejudice to any penalty that may be imposable on him under any other provision of this Act, be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three months but which may extend to three years and shall, in the discretion of the court, also be liable to fine. Explanation – For the purpose of this section, a wilful attempt to evade any tax, penalty or interest chargeable or imposable under this Act or the payment thereof shall include a case where any person-
(i) has in his possession or control any books of account or other documents (being books of account or other documents relevant to any proceeding under this Act) containing a false entry or statement; or
(ii) makes or causes to be made any false entry or statement in such books of accounts or other documents; or
(iii)wilfully omits or causes to be omitted any relevant entry or statement in such books of account or other documents; or
(iv) causes any other circumstance to exist which will have the effect of enabling such person to evade any tax, penalty or interest chargeable or imposable under this Act or the payment thereof”
6. From the reading of the above provision to punish the accused, there must be wilful attempt to evade payment of tax, he must be in possession of the book with false entries, the person should have made false entries in the book of accounts and omitting any entry in the statement of accounts. The petitioner voluntarily disclosed the undisclosed income to the respondent on the inspection conducted under Section 132 of the Income tax Act, 1961 on 18.12.2012. Therefore, there is no intention from the petitioner for willful evading of payment of tax. Admittedly, the respondent on the inspection dated 18.12.2012, had seized the relevant book of accounts and as such the petitioner could not able to file the return of income on or before 05.08.2013. Therefore, the petitioner had no wilful intention to evade tax as alleged by the respondent.
7. That apart, the petitioner had paid the entire tax amount on 13.03.2018 and the respondent had also acknowledged the same by the acknowledgment dated 24.03.2018. Therefore, the offence under Section 276 (c ) (2) of the Income Tax Act is not at all attracted as against the petitioner herein, and the entire criminal proceedings pending against the petitioner is nothing but clear abuse of process of law. As such it cannot be sustained as against the petitioner and it is liable to be quashed.
8. In view of the above discussion, this criminal original petition is allowed. Accordingly, the entire proceedings in E.O.C.No.575 of 2017 on the file of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate(Economic Offences), Egmore, Chennai is quashed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
DISCLAIMER: Though all efforts have been made to reproduce the order accurately and correctly however the access, usage and circulation is subject to the condition that VATinfoline Multimedia is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any mistake/error/omissions.